POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Grass, test with radiosity lighting : Re: Grass, test with radiosity lighting Server Time
14 Nov 2024 04:30:05 EST (-0500)
  Re: Grass, test with radiosity lighting  
From: Bryan Valencia
Date: 1 Apr 2004 13:49:35
Message: <406c643f$1@news.povray.org>
Hmmm that is odd.  Of all the tings computers do well, counting should be a
cake-walk...
FYI this was on a WINXP system.  Maybe it's like bytes where 13898 bytes =
13.57K
:D


"Ross Litscher" <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote in message
news:406c622e$1@news.povray.org...
> "Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
> news:406c3541@news.povray.org...
> > Bryan Valencia wrote:
> > > Time For Trace:    3 hours 54 minutes  14.0 seconds (13811 seconds)
> > >     Total Time:    3 hours 51 minutes  38.0 seconds (13898 seconds)
> >
> > Cool. I want to know how to get the total time less than the time for
> > trace on *my* pictures! :-)  Methinks there's some seconds->readable
> > flaws in there, or some hand editting.
> >
>
> i think this happens on the linux version if you use the "Close image on
> click" switch (what is it, +P?) and don't click the image for a while
after
> it is done rendering. i see it happen when i let a render go overnight.
then
> it's a matter of hours difference between the two.
>
> -ross
>
>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.